Bug#784160: transition: proj
On 06/05/15 23:51, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 05/03/2015 09:45 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 05/03/2015 09:08 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>>> On 2015-05-03 17:25, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>>>> We've had proj 4.9.x in experimental for some time now, and I'd like to
>>>> move it from experimental to unstable as the first stretch transition
>>>> for the Debian GIS team.
>>>> Currently PROJ.4 4.8.0 is unstable and jessie, and PROJ.4 4.9.1 is in
>>>> Updating PROJ.4 from 4.8.0 to 4.9.1 involves a SONAME bump from
>>>> libproj.so.0 to libproj.so.9.
>>> Please go ahead; there are (currently) no entanglements. Thanks for
>>> testing thoroughly in experimental.
>> Thanks, I've uploaded proj 4.9.1-1.
> To resolve the build failures for postgis in hurd-i386 & mipsel, I've
> manually bin-nmu'ed the packages on the respective porterboxes.
> The testsuite is known to fail on these architectures, using
> DEB_BUILD_OPTIIONS=nocheck allows the builds to succeed.
> Since postgis (2.1.5+dfsg-1~exp2) for hurd-i386, and postgis
> (2.1.6+dfsg-1~exp1) for mipsel, the testsuite is skipped on these
> architecture via d/rules. Unfortunately these more recent postgis
> versions are still stuck in NEW.
That got accepted.
The current blockers are the cdo/ppc64el build failure (#763691) and the