Bug#784160: transition: proj

To: Bas Couwenberg <sebastic@xs4all.nl>, 784160@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#784160: transition: proj
From: Jonathan Wiltshire <jmw@debian.org>
Date: Sun, 03 May 2015 20:08:37 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] e12841604bdfe21df3c64e5db5e3d95c@hogwarts.powdarrmonkey.net>
Reply-to: Jonathan Wiltshire <jmw@debian.org>, 784160@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20150503162505.25815.98608.reportbug@osiris.linuxminded.xs4all.nl>
References: <[🔎] 20150503162505.25815.98608.reportbug@osiris.linuxminded.xs4all.nl>

Control: tag -1 confirmed

Control: forwarded -1https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-proj.html


On 2015-05-03 17:25, Bas Couwenberg wrote:

We've had proj 4.9.x in experimental for some time now, and I'd like to
move it from experimental to unstable as the first stretch transition
for the Debian GIS team.

Currently PROJ.4 4.8.0 is unstable and jessie, and PROJ.4 4.9.1 is in
experimental.

Updating PROJ.4 from 4.8.0 to 4.9.1 involves a SONAME bump from
libproj.so.0 to libproj.so.9.

Please go ahead; there are (currently) no entanglements. Thanks fortesting thoroughly in experimental.


--
Jonathan Wiltshire                                      jmw@debian.org
Debian Developer                         http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

<directhex> i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from
            8->10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits
			layered on top of bonghits

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#784160: transition: proj
  - From: Sebastiaan Couwenberg <sebastic@xs4all.nl>

References:
- Bug#784160: transition: proj
  - From: Bas Couwenberg <sebastic@xs4all.nl>

Prev by Date: Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#784160: transition: proj
Next by Date: NEW changes in stable-new
Previous by thread: Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#784160: transition: proj
Next by thread: Bug#784160: transition: proj
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread