Bug#760003: transition: qt-gstreamer
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 29/04/15 08:09, Diane Trout wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 28, 2015 19:07:27 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 28/04/15 08:10, Diane Trout wrote:
>>> On Friday, September 05, 2014 17:53:19 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>>> On 31/08/14 01:08, Diane Trout wrote:
>>>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>>>> Severity: normal
>>>>> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
>>>>> Usertags: transition
>>>>>
>>>>> For the longest time no one had the time to update qt-gstreamer to the
>>>>> GStreamer 1.0 api. We finally managed to do the port and there is
>>>>> progress on patches for the few packages that are using qt-gstreamer.
>>>>
>>>> What's the status of those patches? Are there patches for all the rdeps?
>>>> Packages in experimental? Please file bugs and make them block this one.
>>>>
>>>> Without further details I can't ack this.
>>>
>>> This is the first time I've tried to do a transition, and I dropped this
>>> during the Jessie freeze. (I had guessed the release team would be busy
>>> with other things).
>>>
>>> As for the status of the patches, There's qt-gstreamer itself, it's fine.
>>>
>>> I know the KDE-Telepathy components are all ported, ktp-common-internals,
>>> telepathy-logger-qt, ktp-text-ui, ktp-call-ui, (I've been running against
>>> qt- gstreamer 1.0 for months)
>>>
>>> The other reverse depends appear to be kipi-plugins, kamoso, and qapt
>>>
>>> Looking through Ubuntu vivid, kipi-plugins is already using qt-gstreamer
>>> 1.0 , qapt looks like it stopped using qt gstreamer, and based on a
>>> comment from a Kubuntu developer, I think there is currently a buggy
>>> patch for kamoso.
>>>
>>> Is there any documentation about what should be in the transition bugs
>>> filed against the other packages?
>>
>> Mostly patches. Mention they are for a transition and link to this bug
>> report.
>
> I filed bug 783674 with a patch for kamoso, that builds and seems to work.
>
> Nothing else seems to need patches, so I hadn't filed bug reports. Should I
> have?
No, that's alright.
>
>>
>> You didn't mention digikam, which appears in our transition tracker:
>> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-qt-gstreamer.html
>>
>> What's its status?
>
> Digikam builds against qt-gstreamer-1.0 without any problem, and kubuntu vivid
> is shipping it built against qt-gstreamer-1.0.
Good.
> The last package was qapt, and that appears to be in Debian experimental built
> against qt-gstreamer-1.0.
OK so that will need to be uploaded to unstable when the transition starts. You
can file a bug for that.
Things look good, so you can upload qt-gstreamer to sid.
Regards,
Emilio
Reply to: