[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#760003: transition: qt-gstreamer



On Tuesday, April 28, 2015 19:07:27 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 28/04/15 08:10, Diane Trout wrote:
> > On Friday, September 05, 2014 17:53:19 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> >> On 31/08/14 01:08, Diane Trout wrote:
> >>> Package: release.debian.org
> >>> Severity: normal
> >>> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> >>> Usertags: transition
> >>> 
> >>> For the longest time no one had the time to update qt-gstreamer to the
> >>> GStreamer 1.0 api. We finally managed to do the port and there is
> >>> progress on patches for the few packages that are using qt-gstreamer.
> >> 
> >> What's the status of those patches? Are there patches for all the rdeps?
> >> Packages in experimental? Please file bugs and make them block this one.
> >> 
> >> Without further details I can't ack this.
> > 
> > This is the first time I've tried to do a transition, and I dropped this
> > during the Jessie freeze. (I had guessed the release team would be busy
> > with other things).
> > 
> > As for the status of the patches, There's qt-gstreamer itself, it's fine.
> > 
> > I know the KDE-Telepathy components are all ported, ktp-common-internals,
> > telepathy-logger-qt, ktp-text-ui, ktp-call-ui, (I've been running against
> > qt- gstreamer 1.0 for months)
> > 
> > The other reverse depends appear to be kipi-plugins, kamoso, and qapt
> > 
> > Looking through Ubuntu vivid, kipi-plugins is already using qt-gstreamer
> > 1.0 , qapt looks like it stopped using qt gstreamer, and based on a
> > comment from a Kubuntu developer, I think there is currently a buggy
> > patch for kamoso.
> > 
> > Is there any documentation about what should be in the transition bugs
> > filed against the other packages?
> 
> Mostly patches. Mention they are for a transition and link to this bug
> report.

I filed bug 783674 with a patch for kamoso, that builds and seems to work.

Nothing else seems to need patches, so I hadn't filed bug reports. Should I 
have?

> 
> You didn't mention digikam, which appears in our transition tracker:
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-qt-gstreamer.html
> 
> What's its status?

Digikam builds against qt-gstreamer-1.0 without any problem, and kubuntu vivid 
is shipping it built against qt-gstreamer-1.0.

The last package was qapt, and that appears to be in Debian experimental built 
against qt-gstreamer-1.0.

Diane


Reply to: