Bug#776242: marked as done (unblock: php-elisp/1.13.5-2)
Your message dated Sun, 25 Jan 2015 22:45:27 +0100
with message-id <54C563F7.5020304@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#776242: unblock: php-elisp/1.13.5-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #776242,
regarding unblock: php-elisp/1.13.5-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
776242: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=776242
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package php-elisp
unblock php-elisp/1.13.5-2
This upload solves the upgrade problem reported in
#775390 and #775548.
The patch applied was this one:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=5;filename=0001-Drop-emacs-22-support.patch;att=1;bug=775548
Debdiff:
ola@quartz:~/build/debian/php-elisp$ debdiff php-elisp_1.13.5-1_i386.changes php-elisp_1.13.5-2_i386.changes
File lists identical (after any substitutions)
Control files: lines which differ (wdiff format)
------------------------------------------------
Depends: emacs24 | emacs23 | [-emacs22 |-] emacsen
Installed-Size: [-72-] {+73+}
Version: [-1.13.5-1-] {+1.13.5-2+}
-- System Information:
N/A
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2015-01-25 21:19, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package php-elisp
>
> unblock php-elisp/1.13.5-2
>
> This upload solves the upgrade problem reported in
> #775390 and #775548.
>
> [...]
Unblocked, thanks.
For future reference, we prefer the *source* debdiff in addition/instead
of the binary debdiff. I.e. please run debdiff on the .dsc files.
Thanks,
~Niels
--- End Message ---
Reply to: