On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 11:46:14 -0600, Sergei Golovan wrote: > Hi! > > On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 8:05 AM, Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org> wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 13:58:10 +0000, Simon McVittie wrote: > >> > >> Hello release team, > >> Since this is going to be a transition, and a new upstream SONAME for > >> jessie seems unlikely, should this bug be jessie-ignore'd > >> and fixed for jessie+1 instead? > >> > > If the SONAME changed between wheezy and jessie then this ought to be > > fixed for jessie, IMO. > > I've prepared the fixed packages. Since i've retained the 'blt' > package (it became > a dummy one), the transition isn't strictly necessary. If a package > which build-depends > on blt-dev rebuilds, it gets a new dependency on libblt2.5-8.6. Otherwise, > it just keeps depending on blt which is fine as blt won't go anywhere. > You can't keep a dummy package on SONAME changes, since it doesn't actually provide the ABI older versions of its rdeps expect. Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature