Bug#767833: marked as done (unblock: bashburn/3.1.0-1)
Your message dated Thu, 06 Nov 2014 16:28:32 +0000
with message-id <b5a4167517d84d1e32609f28c640829d@hogwarts.powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#767833: unblock: bashburn/3.1.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #767833,
regarding unblock: bashburn/3.1.0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
767833: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=767833
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please preapprove unblock on package bashburn
I packaged this almost two years ago. I had some problems finding a sponsor and
forgot about the package after a while. I now have a sponsor willing to upload
the package. The old version currently in testing really should be updated
before the release.
The attached diff is against 3.0.1-2 whitch currently awaiting approval for
upload to stable.
unblock bashburn/3.1.0-1
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Control: tag -1 wontfix
On 2014-11-03 19:39, Andreas Noteng wrote:
Den 03. nov. 2014 19:06, skrev Adam D. Barratt:
Thanks. Unfortunately, that still has effectively the same problem -
it
relies on the stable update having been accepted.
The update for testing is independent of the stable update, even if
you
want them both to include the same change; the package will
effectively
branch. The proposed update for testing needs to be based on the
package
that is in testing now and not include changes targetted at other
suites.
Better?
Nack. Sorry, but this diff is enormous for this stage of the cycle, and
it's too invasive for an unblock.
Targetted fixes for bugs might be acceptable through t-p-u; please open
a new bug if you have proposals.
Thanks,
--
Jonathan Wiltshire jmw@debian.org
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw
4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
<directhex> i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from
8->10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits
layered on top of bonghits
--- End Message ---
Reply to: