On 2014-11-06 05:45, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 11:14:14PM +0000, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:(At 'critical' severity, should that be aged a bit or left to test?)By nature this package is not heavily tested since you do not create metapackages every day. The problem also only occures if it happens that you keep non-free or unstable in your sources.list.d dir - otherwise everything is fine (the problem did not showed up for years). So I do not see any reason for an additional waiting period.
Ah, in britney terms ageing is a reduction in waiting period, rather than an increase. Based on what you say though, I'm leaving it at 10 days.
Thanks,
--
Jonathan Wiltshire jmw@debian.org
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw
4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
<directhex> i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from
8->10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits
layered on top of bonghits