Re: Bug#767411: torque: should not be released with jessie
On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Given Dominique's reply on #767411, from my POV I think the best
> solution would be to remove torque completely for jessie (i.e. first
> drop support from openmpi to be able to remove the package and
> remaining reverse dependencies).
4 wheezy DSAs doesn't necessarily sound that horrible, so I don't
think we're clearly at the point where torque should be considered
unsupportable. Maybe the patch backports were an incredible amount of
work?
The package does clearly need to be orphaned, so someone can step up
post-jessie to get the package in sync with upstream.
Best wishes,
Mike
Reply to: