Hi Julien, On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 02:07:25PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 22:27:53 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > > pbs-drmaa as reverse dependency of torque is easy as it is a leaf > > package. The more complicated one would be openmpi which would need to > > drop the build dependency on libtorque2-dev. The reason for this > > dependency was in https://bugs.debian.org/592887 , which needs to be > > dropped again. > > > There's two solutions here. One is to drop torque support from openmpi; > the other is to keep the torque source package but only build the > libtorque library, as I'm assuming the security issues are on the torque > server side. Though that's only useful is that library can still talk > to newer torque version. Given Dominique's reply on #767411, from my POV I think the best solution would be to remove torque completely for jessie (i.e. first drop support from openmpi to be able to remove the package and remaining reverse dependencies). Alastair, could you please take care of updating openmpi to drop the torque support? Regards, Salvatore
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature