[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#753079: transition: librime



On 11/07/14 17:08, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 06:12:18PM -0400, Guo Yixuan wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 3:50 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 03/07/14 21:36, Guo Yixuan wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Osamu Aoki <osamu_aoki_home@nifty.com>
>>>>> I will upload new git head when prompted.  Is it ready?
>>>>
>>>> Yes, it is. (I just noticed you already uploaded it. Thanks a lot!)
>>>
>>> And it has failed on armel because of #727621.
>>
>> Thank you for noting this. It seems to be a rather difficult bug in gcc.
> 
> Thanks from me too.
> 
> But this seems toi be a bug porter amd GCC maintainer has to address.
> If they can not, we should drop armel from Debian.
> 
> Unless we get some workaround patch, this is not something we can do
> much about.

In the case of librime, the rdeps (fcitx-rime and ibus-rime) have never been
built on armel. So you can ask for the removal of the outdated librime armel
binaries (through a bug against ftp.debian.org) and then librime would be able
to migrate. And when the armel issue is fixed and librime builds there, those
binaries will migrate automatically.

Or you can make librime build on armel, like you mentioned in another mail. That
would of course be preferred.

Emilio


Reply to: