On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 02:00:35PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 00:08:28 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > But this seems toi be a bug porter amd GCC maintainer has to address. > > If they can not, we should drop armel from Debian. > I would rather drop any package which does use c++11 features without any > reflection. The c++11 status in GCC (and any compiler using libstdc++) is still > marked as experimental [1]. See [2] for further updates on the c++11 status in > 4.9. Therefore the package maintainers have to accommodate for that, if the > upstream projects don't do it. This is the status for jessie. > The GCC maintainers did address the issue [3], and it can be fixed just by > bumping the cpu requirements to armv7 (as done for sparc/v9 in the past, > to keep the port alive a bit longer). However this shouldn't be done > before the jessie release. However, bumping the CPU requirements for the armel port to armv7 also make that port completely redundant; at that point it's just a slow armhf with no advantages. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature