[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#673538: transition: gnustep-base, gnustep-gui



On 03-07-14 18:44, Yavor Doganov wrote:
>>> I'll ping you when the new core packages pass through NEW, OK?
>>
>> I don't see gnustep-gui 0.24 in NEW or in the archive. Was that ever
>> uploaded?  How are things looking here?
> 
> No, unfortunately nobody volunteered to sponsor them [2] yet...  My
> past sponsors are apparently busy and/or not interested anymore, so
> we're a bit stuck at the moment.  I guess patience is the key.

It seems the GNUStep team is seriously lacking some help to upload its
packages. I can only assume that there is no DD on your team (or that
the team consists of one person). I am will to help with this transition
by reviewing prepared packages and uploading. What exactly do you think
is needed, all uploads related to [1]? Are the specific for this
transition, or can they be done beforehand straight into unstable? How
sure are you that they are real problems, I read you say they *may* lead
to issues. Is there a way to check? Which bugs you think *must* be fixed
for this transition to be successful?

I have one request. As I don't know GNUStep and its apps (I haven't used
any package of it before that I am aware of) I would like to see a
README.testing in the source packages that describe how I can perform
(simple) checks that the package works. We started adding these
README.testing files to packages maintained by the accessibility team to
aid team members and I really like the idea. For an example of what I
mean you can look at daisy-player [1].

Paul

[1]
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-a11y/daisy-player.git;a=blob_plain;f=debian/README.testing

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: