Bug#673538: transition: gnustep-base, gnustep-gui
On 28/05/14 03:29, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 12:44:45PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
>> Yavor, is there any plan to do the transition? #673538 didn't look
>> like it was blocking on us.
>
> Please accept my apologies for being MIA for so long.
>
> I have the new GNUstep core packages ready at mentors.d.n (targeted
> for experimental, of course). There were new upstream releases in the
> meantime, so we'll omit -gui0.22 entirely. IOW:
>
> libgnustep-base1.22 -> 1.24
> libgnustep-gui0.20 -> 0.24
I have updated the tracker for that.
As for libobj3 -> libobj4, there's just openvpn-auth-ldap remaining, which is
#747989. That shouldn't block this transition though AFAICS.
What can block it is gnustep-base failing on s390x (it may be failing on other
architectures as well, as the others were built 2 years ago and have never been
retried):
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gnustep-base&suite=experimental
> I rebuilt all GNUstep packages in the archive and fortunately there
> are only two FTBFS bugs -- #749553 (cenon.app) and #749554 (sogo).
I see one is fixed and the other one has a patch.
> gnustep-dl2 also fails to build, but that's due to the
> texi2html->makeinfo switch in gnustep-make and is trivial to fix (I'll
> report the bug tomorrow). In the next few days I'll examine the build
> logs for compiler warnings and will report those issues that may lead
> to problems at runtime.
>
> I'll ping you when the new core packages pass through NEW, OK?
I don't see gnustep-gui 0.24 in NEW or in the archive. Was that ever uploaded?
How are things looking here?
Regards,
Emilio
Reply to: