Bug#747534: transition: libetpan
- To: Ricardo Mones <mones@debian.org>
- Cc: 747534@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#747534: transition: libetpan
- From: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 14:13:18 +0200
- Message-id: <53B3F75E.7060009@debian.org>
- Reply-to: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>, 747534@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <20140702124802.22467c21@busgosu>
- References: <20140511183144.GA1758@downhill.g.la> <20140511183831.GH4146@betterave.cristau.org> <20140512080045.GA14315@trasgu> <20140512084756.GJ4146@betterave.cristau.org> <20140512152240.GB14315@trasgu> <20140524170956.GA29497@trasgu> <5380D3F0.4070900@debian.org> <20140525003846.GA4147@trasgu> <20140609134439.GC5239@trasgu> <5395C57E.20209@debian.org> <20140609144727.GE5239@trasgu> <20140702124802.22467c21@busgosu>
On 02/07/14 12:48, Ricardo Mones wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 16:47:27 +0200
> Ricardo Mones <mones@debian.org> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 04:32:30PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> On 09/06/14 15:44, Ricardo Mones wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 02:38:47AM +0200, Ricardo Mones wrote:
>>>>> Hi Emilio,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 07:16:32PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>> […]
>>>>>> Can you upload this to experimental so it can go through NEW?
>>>>>
>>>>> Sure, done.
>>>> […]
>>>>
>>>> Libetpan 1.4.1 has been in experimental for a week, and seems a
>>>> transition tracker is already created.
>>>>
>>>> Does it mean is it ok to upload it to unstable?
>>>
>>> What's the status of claws-mail? You said you were waiting for upstream
>>> to make a release that works with the new libetpan. If that's still a
>>> blocker, then do not proceed with this, but if that release is out, then
>>> go ahead and upload both libetpan and claws-mail to unstable.
>>
>> Well, that already happened for Claws Mail 3.10.0, and today again
>> for 3.10.1, so I'll proceed :)
>
> AFAICS everything is built fine¹, but PTS/testing migration excuses² says
> there's a missing libetpan16, which of course won't be since this was a
> soname bump and now its libetpan17...
That's because libetpan needs to be decrufted (i.e. the old libetpan16 need to
be removed). However I haven't asked for a decruft yet because the transition
isn't quite finished, as cairo-dock-plug-ins hasn't been rebuilt yet because of
#751171, and now also because of bd-uninst issue with gnutls26/gnutls28. So once
cairo-dock-plug-ins build-depends on libgnutls28-dev (so that the build
dependencies can be satisfied), then as soon as #751171 is fixed the package
will build on s390x and the migration will be done.
So, can you file a bug for the bd-uninst issue on cairo-dock-plug-ins and make
it block this bug?
Thanks,
Emilio
Reply to: