On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 16:47:27 +0200 Ricardo Mones <mones@debian.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 04:32:30PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > On 09/06/14 15:44, Ricardo Mones wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 02:38:47AM +0200, Ricardo Mones wrote: > > >> Hi Emilio, > > >> > > >> On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 07:16:32PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort > > >> wrote: > > >>> Hi, > > >>> > > > […] > > >>> Can you upload this to experimental so it can go through NEW? > > >> > > >> Sure, done. > > > […] > > > > > > Libetpan 1.4.1 has been in experimental for a week, and seems a > > > transition tracker is already created. > > > > > > Does it mean is it ok to upload it to unstable? > > > > What's the status of claws-mail? You said you were waiting for upstream > > to make a release that works with the new libetpan. If that's still a > > blocker, then do not proceed with this, but if that release is out, then > > go ahead and upload both libetpan and claws-mail to unstable. > > Well, that already happened for Claws Mail 3.10.0, and today again > for 3.10.1, so I'll proceed :) AFAICS everything is built fine¹, but PTS/testing migration excuses² says there's a missing libetpan16, which of course won't be since this was a soname bump and now its libetpan17... Is something wrong? Is there something left to do from my side? regards, ¹ https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libetpan&suite=unstable ² http://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=libetpan -- Ricardo Mones http://people.debian.org/~mones «Never let someone who says it cannot be done interrupt the person who is doing it.»
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature