[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#739079: transition: libav10



On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 08:16:05PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> (Putting the bug back into the loop.)
> 
> On 2014-02-16 21:47:25, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 03:44:01PM -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> > > On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> wrote:
> > > > Reinhard Tartler <siretart@tauware.de> schrieb:
> > > >> Package: release.debian.org
> > > >> Severity: normal
> > > >> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > > >> Usertags: transition
> > > >>
> > > >> Hi,
> > > >>
> > > >> We have a new libav transition pending. Libav 10 is prepared in
> > > >> debian/experimental, and I've started to build packges against this new
> > > >> version; in fact, more or more packages require Libav 10 and the new
> > > >> APIs it provides.
> > > >
> > > > Is the alpha2 version in experimental final in terms of API deprecations?
> > > 
> > > It should be. I intend to release and upload 10_beta1 to experimental
> > > by end of this weekend (tomorrow latest), and includes some additions
> > > that happened after alpha2 (i.e., there will be a shlibs, but no
> > > SONAME bump). Neverthless, I think it should be safe.
> > 
> > Ok. I'll run a test build against libav/exp and file bugs against all packages
> > which fail.
> 
> Thank you Moritz for doing the test build. I've added usertags to the
> bugs you've already filed (user
> pkg-multimeida-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org, usertag libav10):
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org;tag=libav10

I'm already doing the same, haven't announced it yet since the rebuild
isn't fully finished. Better use this one instead:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=libav10;users=jmm@debian.org
 
Cheers,
        Moritz


Reply to: