(Putting the bug back into the loop.) On 2014-02-16 21:47:25, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 03:44:01PM -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> wrote: > > > Reinhard Tartler <siretart@tauware.de> schrieb: > > >> Package: release.debian.org > > >> Severity: normal > > >> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org > > >> Usertags: transition > > >> > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> We have a new libav transition pending. Libav 10 is prepared in > > >> debian/experimental, and I've started to build packges against this new > > >> version; in fact, more or more packages require Libav 10 and the new > > >> APIs it provides. > > > > > > Is the alpha2 version in experimental final in terms of API deprecations? > > > > It should be. I intend to release and upload 10_beta1 to experimental > > by end of this weekend (tomorrow latest), and includes some additions > > that happened after alpha2 (i.e., there will be a shlibs, but no > > SONAME bump). Neverthless, I think it should be safe. > > Ok. I'll run a test build against libav/exp and file bugs against all packages > which fail. Thank you Moritz for doing the test build. I've added usertags to the bugs you've already filed (user pkg-multimeida-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org, usertag libav10): https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org;tag=libav10 Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature