Bug#773203: unblock: php5/5.6.4+dfsg-0+deb8u1
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
JFTR php5/5.6.4+dfsg-1 has hit unstable now. I will prepare the usual
comparison of test suite and debdiff between 5.6.2 and 5.6.4 tomorrow.
Cheers,
Ondrej
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014, at 13:27, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014, at 21:56, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
> >
> > On Mon, 2014-12-15 at 16:01 +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> > > this is a preliminary request to unblock php5/5.6.4+dfsg-1 that hasn't
> > > been release yet.
> > [...]
> > > The option I would like to avoid is backporting the patches for
> > > php5/5.6.2+dfsg-1 and then flushing all that with next security update
> > > after a jessie is released as stable. This seem to be an extra work
> > > that could be possibly avoided.
> > >
> > > So, the question is whether you concur with security team and you will
> > > allow uploading 5.6.4+dfsg-0+deb8u1 to t-p-u. I understand we might
> > > face some extra breakages (although I hope not), but this will happen
> > > anyway with next security upload.
> >
> > I did mention this on IRC, but as it hasn't had any follow-up there -
>
> Sorry for that, we are moving our offices, so everything is in
> turmoil...
>
> > why would t-p-u be involved? If we were to accept 5.6.4 (and possibly
> > further updates) in to jessie prior to the release, the simplest
> > solution would seem to be to unblock the package from unstable.
> >
> > It's entirely possible that I'm missing something, in which case please
> > enlighten me. :-)
>
> No enlightening today, sorry :). You are right. Somehow I suspected
> (without checking) that PHP has too many build-deps that at least one
> will be broken :). That seems not to be the case, so normal update from
> unstable is still possible.
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Ondřej Surý <ondrej@sury.org>
> Knot DNS (https://www.knot-dns.cz/) – a high-performance DNS server
--
Ondřej Surý <ondrej@sury.org>
Knot DNS (https://www.knot-dns.cz/) – a high-performance DNS server
Reply to: