[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#769498: marked as done (unblock: rtkit/0.11-2)



Your message dated Sun, 16 Nov 2014 20:37:32 +0000
with message-id <20141116203732.GZ6216@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#769498: unblock: rtkit/0.11-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #769498,
regarding unblock: rtkit/0.11-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
769498: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=769498
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Dear release team,

I write to ask if the attached diff would be an appropriate upload to
unstable that would be granted an unblock request. It fixes two severity
important bugs:

#696900 Wrong build-dependency on libpolkit-backend-1-dev
#747568 [rtkit-daemon.service:32] Unknown lvalue 'ControlGroup'

The first should avoid a FTBFS when polkit is updated in unstable
(probably soon after jessie is released), the second avoids a warning
during boot on systemd systems.

Please find attached the diff of the proposed upload against 0.11-1.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index c32f5f7..8dc7726 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+rtkit (0.11-2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Remove build dependency on libpolkit-backend-1-dev, it is not used
+    (Closes: #696900)
+  * Drop removed ControlGroup stanza (Closes: #747568)
+
+ -- Felipe Sateler <fsateler@debian.org>  Thu, 13 Nov 2014 23:56:19 -0300
+
 rtkit (0.11-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * New upstream release.
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index 7e6ae4c..b9c317d 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -11,7 +11,6 @@ Build-Depends:
  debhelper (>= 7.0.50~),
  libcap-dev,
  libdbus-1-dev,
- libpolkit-backend-1-dev
 Standards-Version: 3.9.5
 Vcs-Git: https://alioth.debian.org/anonscm/git/pkg-multimedia/rtkit.git
 Vcs-Browser: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-multimedia/rtkit.git
diff --git a/debian/patches/0002-Drop-Removed-ControlGroup-stanza.patch b/debian/patches/0002-Drop-Removed-ControlGroup-stanza.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..763953b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/patches/0002-Drop-Removed-ControlGroup-stanza.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+Description: Drop removed ControlGroup stanza
+ Systemd >= 205 do not have this directive anymore.
+ This is not a problem for us because the debian kernel does not have
+ CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED enabled, so rt budgets are not per-cgroup
+Bug-Debian: 747568
+--- a/rtkit-daemon.service.in
++++ b/rtkit-daemon.service.in
+@@ -27,9 +27,5 @@ CapabilityBoundingSet=CAP_SYS_NICE CAP_D
+ PrivateTmp=yes
+ PrivateNetwork=yes
+ 
+-# Work around the fact that the Linux currently doesn't assign any RT
+-# budget to CPU control groups that have none configured explicitly
+-ControlGroup=cpu:/
+-
+ [Install]
+ WantedBy=graphical.target
diff --git a/debian/patches/series b/debian/patches/series
index cf9a390..1558bca 100644
--- a/debian/patches/series
+++ b/debian/patches/series
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
 0001-SECURITY-Pass-uid-of-caller-to-polkit.patch
+0002-Drop-Removed-ControlGroup-stanza.patch

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 04:17:03PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 9:16 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire <jmw@debian.org> wrote:
> > Control: tag -1 confirmed
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 12:08:35AM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> >> I write to ask if the attached diff would be an appropriate upload to
> >> unstable that would be granted an unblock request. It fixes two severity
> >> important bugs:
> >
> > Yes. Please ping when it's in the archive.
> 
> I uploaded this today.

Unblocked.

-- 
Jonathan Wiltshire                                      jmw@debian.org
Debian Developer                         http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---

Reply to: