Bug#767074: unblock: taurus/3.3.1+dfsg-1
so here the question
> That's where you come in. You're the maintainer and the expert in this
> package. Are 251 and 221 that common and important that the other
> changes are worth less testing than usual?
Yes I know about the package, I trust also the upstream when they did that they did all the usual tests.
They did the effort to prepare a release for Debian8.
To my opinion,it is better to take all the modifications instead of starting to extract only the most important fixes.
I do not want to propose something different than the official upsteam version in the Debian distribution.
I do not want to see on internet comment like, do not use the Debian version it is not equivalent to the official upstream version.
forme this a moral contract between us and me.
Other point , even if this package popcon is very low it is very important for the community behind it.
(the synchrotron radiation facilities community [1])
- so my advice as DD to the release team is that Debian8 would be better with this version of the package for this community.
Cheers
Frederic
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synchrotron
Reply to: