Bug#767074: unblock: taurus/3.3.1+dfsg-1
- To: PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr>
- Cc: 767074@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#767074: unblock: taurus/3.3.1+dfsg-1
- From: intrigeri <intrigeri@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 12:07:39 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 85lhnciux0.fsf@boum.org>
- Reply-to: intrigeri <intrigeri@debian.org>, 767074@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <20141030182858.GB9510@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net> (Jonathan Wiltshire's message of "Thu, 30 Oct 2014 18:28:58 +0000")
- References: <20141028093655.4196.92282.reportbug@mordor> <85tx2o8lx8.fsf@boum.org> <A2A20EC3B8560D408356CAC2FC148E53B1FBB0EA@SUN-DAG3.synchrotron-soleil.fr> <c862be7c7634a36ca555536b1152d28a@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org> <A2A20EC3B8560D408356CAC2FC148E53B1FBB2E2@SUN-DAG3.synchrotron-soleil.fr> <20141030182858.GB9510@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net>
Hi Frederic-Emmanuel,
Jonathan Wiltshire wrote (30 Oct 2014 18:28:58 GMT) :
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 08:19:36PM +0000, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
>> I would say that 251 and 221 deserve an upgrade of both package.
>>
>> Do you need more informations ?
> I think what Adam meant was that with no release team relationship with
> upstream, no prior knowledge of the code, no Debian bugs and just a bunch
> of links to upstream bug reports, we have absolutely no way to assess the
> impact of:
> 49 files changed, 745 insertions(+), 190 deletions(-) (taurus)
> 43 files changed, 684 insertions(+), 580 deletions(-) (sardana)
> That's where you come in. You're the maintainer and the expert in this
> package. Are 251 and 221 that common and important that the other
> changes are worth less testing than usual?
Ping?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
Reply to: