On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 13:02:04 +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> 14.11.2014 12:42, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> > FWIW I don't believe build-conflicts on libc achieve anything, so I'm
> > unhappy with -13.
>
> I'm not happy with it either, but why do you say it does not achieve
> anything? Why do you say so, is this control field ignored?
>
Its only effect is to get that package removed if it's installed.
Somehow removing libc doesn't seem like a good idea.
> At any rate I changed that to build-depend on libc-dev-bin (>>2.19-13 | <<2.19).
>
> Can you say something about the FTBFS on hurd-i386 with the new test of
> getpwnam() (not)working, as seen in the buildd logs? It sigsegvs on the
> following one-line program:
>
> int main(void) { return getpwnam("root") ? 0 : 1; }
> cc -static test.c
>
No, I can't.
Cheers,
Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature