[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#766283: marked as done (please announce release name for jessie+1 in time for jessie to support it)

Your message dated Sun, 9 Nov 2014 12:37:40 +0000
with message-id <20141109123740.GC2830@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#766283: please announce release name for jessie+1 in time for jessie to support it
has caused the Debian Bug report #766283,
regarding please announce release name for jessie+1 in time for jessie to support it
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
766283: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=766283
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal

debootstrap needs to contain the name of jessie+1 release, in order to
support debootstrapping that on a jessie system.

In the wheezy release process, we didn't learn the name of jessie until
it was too late to get debootstrap to support it. (#706788) That was
later fixed in R1.

I feel that was a process failure, and ask the release team to please
tell us what name to use for jessie+1 in debootstrap, ideally before the
freeze. Also, please adjust your procedures so that happens
automatically going forward.

-- 
see shy jo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 06:43:27PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> debootstrap needs to contain the name of jessie+1 release, in order to
> support debootstrapping that on a jessie system.
> 
> In the wheezy release process, we didn't learn the name of jessie until
> it was too late to get debootstrap to support it. (#706788) That was
> later fixed in R1.
> 
> I feel that was a process failure, and ask the release team to please
> tell us what name to use for jessie+1 in debootstrap, ideally before the
> freeze. Also, please adjust your procedures so that happens
> automatically going forward.

Jessie+1 will be called "Stretch", and +2 "Buster". We will take reasonable
changes in Jessie around this topic for the time being.

-- 
Jonathan Wiltshire                                      jmw@debian.org
Debian Developer                         http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: