Bug#760050: transition: llvm-toolchain-3.5
Control: tags -1 confirmed pending
On 21/09/14 14:34, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> On 21/09/2014 13:39, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 19/09/14 20:15, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>>> On 19/09/2014 19:43, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>>>> On 2014-09-19 18:22, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>>>>> On 2014-09-19 18:03, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>>>>>> Control: forwarded -1
>>>>>> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/llvm-defaults-3.html
>>>>>> On 16/09/2014 19:58, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>>>>>> On 05/09/14 17:47, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>>>>>> Ping? I'm mostly interested in whether the affected packages are in
>>>>>>> the tracker, i.e. we don't have 200 packages to transition but less
>>>>>>> than a handful.
>>>>>> Sorry about the lag.
>>>>>> That seems wrong to me.
>>>>>> apt-rdepends -r libllvm3.4
>>>>>> suggests more packages like mesa, python-llvm, gambas, etc
>>>>>>
>>>>>> However, I am not a specialist of transition. So, it might be just
>>>>>> me :)
>>>>> I think the problem is here:
>>>>>
>>>>> /lib(clang1-3.5|libllvm3.5)/
>>>>>
>>>>> i.e. liblibllvm3.5
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll play with the tracker and see what happens.
>>>> Ok, this seems to come out with sensible results:
>>>>
>>>> is_good = .depends ~ /lib(clang1-3.5|llvm3.5)/ | .depends ~
>>>> /python-clang-3.5/;
>>>> is_bad = .depends ~ /lib(clang1-3.4|llvm3.4)/ | .depends ~
>>>> /python-clang-3.4/;
>>>>
>>>> How does it look to you?
>>>>
>>> Much better, thanks :)
>>>
>>>> Some things left on that list is going to need a source upload to fix
>>>> dependencies on -3.4 packages, plus llvm-dev switching default
>>>> version, if you want 3.4 removing.
>>>>
>>> yep, business as usual :/
>> You initially said you wanted to keep 3.4 for jessie, no? So this is a matter of
>> changing the defaults, and then getting a few packages rebuilt and some others
>> updating their (build-)dependencies. Isn't that the case anymore? Can you
>> explain the plan here in detail?
>>
>>
> I haven't change my plan but I would like as many as possible packages
> to switch to 3.5 :)
>
> Sorry for the confusion, that is probably my fault!
No worries. Please go ahead. You probably have until the freeze to switch as
many packages as you can.
Emilio
Reply to: