Bug#760050: transition: llvm-toolchain-3.5
On 19/09/14 20:15, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> On 19/09/2014 19:43, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>> On 2014-09-19 18:22, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>>> On 2014-09-19 18:03, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>>>> Control: forwarded -1
>>>> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/llvm-defaults-3.html
>>>> On 16/09/2014 19:58, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>>>> On 05/09/14 17:47, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>>>> Ping? I'm mostly interested in whether the affected packages are in
>>>>> the tracker, i.e. we don't have 200 packages to transition but less
>>>>> than a handful.
>>>> Sorry about the lag.
>>>> That seems wrong to me.
>>>> apt-rdepends -r libllvm3.4
>>>> suggests more packages like mesa, python-llvm, gambas, etc
>>>>
>>>> However, I am not a specialist of transition. So, it might be just
>>>> me :)
>>>
>>> I think the problem is here:
>>>
>>> /lib(clang1-3.5|libllvm3.5)/
>>>
>>> i.e. liblibllvm3.5
>>>
>>> I'll play with the tracker and see what happens.
>>
>> Ok, this seems to come out with sensible results:
>>
>> is_good = .depends ~ /lib(clang1-3.5|llvm3.5)/ | .depends ~
>> /python-clang-3.5/;
>> is_bad = .depends ~ /lib(clang1-3.4|llvm3.4)/ | .depends ~
>> /python-clang-3.4/;
>>
>> How does it look to you?
>>
> Much better, thanks :)
>
>> Some things left on that list is going to need a source upload to fix
>> dependencies on -3.4 packages, plus llvm-dev switching default
>> version, if you want 3.4 removing.
>>
> yep, business as usual :/
You initially said you wanted to keep 3.4 for jessie, no? So this is a matter of
changing the defaults, and then getting a few packages rebuilt and some others
updating their (build-)dependencies. Isn't that the case anymore? Can you
explain the plan here in detail?
Emilio
Reply to: