Bug#746388: marked as done (transition: packagekit 0.9)
Your message dated Mon, 15 Sep 2014 10:29:09 +0200
with message-id <5416A355.9030703@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#746388: transition: packagekit 0.9
has caused the Debian Bug report #746388,
regarding transition: packagekit 0.9
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
746388: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=746388
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: transition: packagekit 0.9
- From: Matthias Klumpp <mak@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 17:31:15 +0200
- Message-id: <20140429153115.4774.27528.reportbug@sirius>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
I want to upload a new version of PackageKit very soon, which has some API/ABI
breaks.
Most of the affected packages are maintained by me and need bigger adjustments,
the others should be fine with a binNMU.
I will add more details as soon as I prepared the packages for testing.
Cheers,
Matthias
Ben file:
title = "packagekit 0.9";
is_affected = .build-depends ~ /libpackagekit/;
is_good = .depends ~ "libpackagekit-glib2-18" | .depends ~ "libpackagekit-
qt2-6";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libpackagekit-glib2-14" | .depends ~ "libpackagekit-
qt2-2";
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 07/09/14 15:10, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> Hi!
> Sorry for the delay on the PK transition, that thing became a bit
> complex, since some dependencies of it were not yet ready upstream,
> and I was writing a thesis, which took priority.
> Anyway, I just wanted to give a quick heads up, since I am going to
> upload PK 0.9.x to unstable - depending on the state of its reverse
> dependencies and the time I have - this week or next week (likely date
> could be the 16.09, but maybe the dependencies get ready faster)
> Cheers and thanks for the patience!
This is now over. Closing.
Emilio
--- End Message ---
Reply to: