Bug#752999: transition: libass
- To: Alessio Treglia <alessio@debian.org>
- Cc: 752999@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#752999: transition: libass
- From: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 10:27:59 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 5416A30F.5050808@debian.org>
- Reply-to: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>, 752999@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <53B44A5C.7010603@debian.org>
- References: <20140628105932.6683.96038.reportbug@nemesis> <53AEC7A9.3080807@debian.org> <CAMHuwowGZRNewWoFOiDQK909Tb=6OmPxYdaGgW88rPvMrSh-cw@mail.gmail.com> <53B3DF4D.80102@debian.org> <CAMHuwoz=-06ndb_2bLQY672_yK34vRhm-GFQ94hatZrVAQHr1A@mail.gmail.com> <53B44A5C.7010603@debian.org>
On 02/07/14 20:07, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: block -1 by 739385
> Control: tags -1 pending
>
> On 02/07/14 12:46, Alessio Treglia wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
>> <pochu@debian.org> wrote:
>>> Great. xbmc build-depends on libass but doesn't depend on it, so it won't need
>>> any binnmus / is not really affected. Please go ahead with this.
>
> Things are looking good except for aegisub, which failed on armel, see #739385
> and #727621. (It also failed on mipsel with an ICE, but I hope that was a
> temporary glitch. Let's see if it fails again or not).
The aegisub/armel binaries got removed and it finally migrated, so this is now
finished. Closing.
Emilio
Reply to: