[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#749560: marked as done (transition: miniupnpc)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Sep 2014 21:04:55 +0200
with message-id <540F4F57.8060600@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#749560: transition: miniupnpc
has caused the Debian Bug report #749560,
regarding transition: miniupnpc
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
749560: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=749560
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Hi,

I wish to upload miniupnpc version 1.9.20140401, which bumped the SONAME
to 10. Affected packages (as per apt-rdepends):

Reverse Depends: 0ad (>= 0.0.16-2+b1)
Reverse Depends: bitcoin-qt (>= 0.9.1-1)
Reverse Depends: bitcoind (>= 0.9.1-1)
Reverse Depends: libeiskaltdcpp2.2 (>= 2.2.9-3)
Reverse Depends: libminiupnpc-dev (= 1.6-3)
Reverse Depends: litecoin-qt (>= 0.8.7.1-1)
Reverse Depends: litecoind (>= 0.8.7.1-1)
Reverse Depends: maki-plugins (>= 1.4.0+dfsg-1+b1)
Reverse Depends: megaglest (>= 3.7.1-3)
Reverse Depends: miniupnpc (>= 1.6-3)
Reverse Depends: transmission-cli (>= 2.82-1.1)
Reverse Depends: transmission-daemon (>= 2.82-1.1)
Reverse Depends: transmission-gtk (>= 2.82-1.1)
Reverse Depends: transmission-qt (>= 2.82-1.1)
Reverse Depends: warzone2100 (>= 3.1~beta11-2.1)

Note that I would like this transition to happen ASAP, because of #748913.

I'm holding the upload until I have your green light. Note that I haven't
tested to rebuilding all the reverse dependencies, and I'm not sure I'll
have the time to do so in the forseable future, so help regarding this
would be really appreciated.

Cheers,

Thomas Goirand (zigo)

Ben file:

title = "miniupnpc";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libminiupnpc8" | .depends ~ "libminiupnpc10";
is_good = .depends ~ "libminiupnpc10";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libminiupnpc8";

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 26/08/14 22:41, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 26/08/14 22:34, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 09:13:59 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>
>>> Everything's good except for transmission, which failed on kfreebsd. Probably a
>>> miniupnpc call only compiled on that architecture. Once that's fixed, things
>>> should be ready to transition.
>>>
>> Can somebody please look into the transmission RC bugs please?  Having
>> this blocked forever is not the way forward.
> 
> Thomas volunteered to NMU transmission on #754982. Hopefully he gets to it soon.

That finally happened, transmission migrated and the old miniupnpc libraries got
removed from testing. Let's close this now.

Emilio

--- End Message ---
Reply to: