On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 08:35:10AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On 2014-04-07 8:10, Ricardo Mones wrote: > >On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 04:39:12PM +0000, Debian testing watch wrote: > >>FYI: The status of the sylpheed source package > >>in Debian's testing distribution has changed. > >> > >> Previous version: 3.4.0~beta7-1 > >> Current version: 3.4.0-1 > > > > Seems I failed to prevent the above despite > >https://bugs.debian.org/743749 > > > > Can anyone explain me what happened > > sylpheed migrated to testing in the britney run that started at > 22:00UTC on Saturday night; it was already in testing by the time > you filed the bug. Ouch. > (Note that the list of RC bugs in testing / unstable is produced for > britney by the BTS four times a day, so even filing the bug a few > hours earlier would not have sufficed; it would need to have been > filed before 1800UTC.) Even more ouch. > >and what should I have done instead? > > Invent a time machine. :-) I knew I shouldn't have left that for tomorrow... :)) Thanks for the details Adam. I guess at least people with apt-listbugs will see the bug and think twice before upgrading. best regards, -- Ricardo Mones ~ Don't take the name of root in vain. /usr/src/linux/README
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature