[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#720611: marked as done (nmu: cgsi-gsoap on sh4)

Your message dated Fri, 23 Aug 2013 23:16:00 +0100
with message-id <1377296160.31458.8.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#720611: nmu: cgsi-gsoap on sh4
has caused the Debian Bug report #720611,
regarding nmu: cgsi-gsoap on sh4
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
720611: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=720611
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

Hi,

libcgsi-gsoap1_1.3.5-2 was built against libgsoap3 on all architectures
except sh4, where it was built against libgsoap2.

nmu libcgsi-gsoap1_1.3.5-2 . sh4 . -m "Rebuild for libgsoap3"

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Fri, 2013-08-23 at 23:44 +0200, Mattias Ellert wrote:
> libcgsi-gsoap1_1.3.5-2 was built against libgsoap3 on all architectures
> except sh4, where it was built against libgsoap2.

sh4 isn't an official architecture, so the Release Team don't have the
ability to binNMU (or prefer other wanna-build actions) for its package.

I'd suggest contacting the buildd maintainers for that architecture via
http://www.debian-ports.org/contacts

Regards,

Adam

--- End Message ---
Reply to: