Re: syncevolution bug #679657 in stable
Em 09-08-2013 19:20, Adam D. Barratt escreveu:
> On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 03:04 +0100, Rui Miguel P. Bernardo wrote:
>> Since the bug will get fixed in unstable (and later in testing), I would
>> like to request to fix it in stable.
> [...]
>> If all is ok here I think 'm almost ready to proceed to the next step
>> and use reportbug report a bug against "release.debian.org"
>> pseudo-package with the attached debdiff attached (I'm following the
>> example from http://bugs.debian.org/714759).
> Thanks for your - very expansive :-) - mail regarding this bug, and for
> caring about getting it fixed in stable.
>
> In general, we strongly prefer having the bug fixed in unstable before
> we look at a fix for stable; this helps ensure that (at least most)
> issues with the fix are spotted before they make it in to a stable
> update and reduces the likelihood of the fix not being included in the
> next stable release.
I understand that's the normal process. I guess this bug could be an
exception, for it's simplicity.
>
> Looking through the bug log, it appears that the maintainer previously
> indicated that they'd be receptive to an NMU, so hopefully getting it
> resolved in unstable shouldn't be too much of an issue.
Did you really mean "unstable" in your last sentence? Or did you mean
"stable" instead of "unstable"?
>
> Regards,
>
> Adam
>
Reply to: