On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 11:11:05 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 1:27 AM, Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> wrote: > > Control: block -1 by 692980 694131 693560 693639 693641 692809 692505 > > > > For the record, the following packages are known to FTBFS against libav > > 9: > > > > audacious-plugins: #692505 > > audacity: #692809 > > electricsheep: #692980 > > qutecom: #693560 > > vice: #693641 > > vtk: #693639 > > zoneminder: #694131 > > > > Setting them as blockers to keep track. > > Procedural question: Are these bugs blockers to start the transition? > Does the release team require all of them to be fixed in experimental > (via MU or NMUs) before uploading libav9 to unstable? > Not necessarily, but we'd like to know they're not going to sit unfixed for months. So at least having a patch tag would be good. Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature