Re: Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9

[Reinhard Tartler <siretart@gmail.com>]

On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 1:27 AM, Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> wrote:
> Control: block -1 by 692980 694131 693560 693639 693641 692809 692505
>
> For the record, the following packages are known to FTBFS against libav
> 9:
>
> audacious-plugins: #692505
> audacity: #692809
> electricsheep: #692980
> qutecom: #693560
> vice: #693641
> vtk: #693639
> zoneminder: #694131
>
> Setting them as blockers to keep track.

Procedural question: Are these bugs blockers to start the transition?
Does the release team require all of them to be fixed in experimental
(via MU or NMUs) before uploading libav9 to unstable?


-- 
regards,
    Reinhard