Bug#694614: tpu: cairo-dock/3.0.0-3 (pre-approval)
- To: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <iwamatsu@nigauri.org>, 694614@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>, intrigeri <intrigeri@debian.org>, Youhei SASAKI <uwabami@gfd-dennou.org>
- Subject: Bug#694614: tpu: cairo-dock/3.0.0-3 (pre-approval)
- From: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 14:09:59 +0000
- Message-id: <1357913399.32456.10.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
- Reply-to: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>, 694614@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <CABMQnVJ0tw4ur5TvrUCxsBGrYzZ5ekutdSJD10YO8zKtDq=DNA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <87y5hmugvd.wl%uwabami@gfd-dennou.org> <854nk75quw.fsf@boum.org> <CABMQnV+N21PFxidYC25sTZ1_Y70BJq6Act1e6C1S1zV+vZgR0A__34690.9043648795$1354324168$gmane$org@mail.gmail.com> <50B95B73.9000102@debian.org> <CABMQnVK02vGu01MccK1BFJqORrN1AAKH4vXhWg_TbJQ2KLv_sw@mail.gmail.com> <CABMQnVKDq+81PGpcxf_py-tFD-DPqUsJe6BjMXQcmjmqYh2Zug@mail.gmail.com> <20121202093105.GD5634@radis.cristau.org> <CABMQnVJKm7WUQovsTyQU7gxLh5uQTR7-L_8etxHLm9RWNjhLFQ@mail.gmail.com> <20121215224315.GW5634@radis.cristau.org> <CABMQnVLrAqKkEe6cZN8FuGuQYzL+DOVd8DZXn72GLZ4XPrtD6Q@mail.gmail.com> <1355664521.32176.35.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org> <CABMQnVKoJ67NPgVfb3=PrdWnYjEKZY-_gDur8nkXxzoSEuNr=A@mail.gmail.com> <1356098310.24016.16.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org> <1357045742.15480.2.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org> <CABMQnVJ0tw4ur5TvrUCxsBGrYzZ5ekutdSJD10YO8zKtDq=DNA@mail.gmail.com>
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo + confirmed
On Fri, 2013-01-11 at 20:10 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> I deleted these patches and applied the patch for correcting #676841 from
> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~cairo-dock-team/cairo-dock-core/cairo-dock/revision/1075.
> Would you check this?
+cairo-dock (3.0.0-3) testing; urgency=low
+
+ * Fix syntax error in copyright file.
+ * Fix segfault when using log out applet. (Closes: #676841)
3.0.0-2+deb7u1 is a more conventional version number here, to make it
clear that the upload was "out of sequence". Please go ahead; thanks.
Regards,
Adam
Reply to: