Bug#694614: tpu: cairo-dock/3.0.0-3 (pre-approval)
- To: 694614@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <iwamatsu@nigauri.org>, Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>, intrigeri <intrigeri@debian.org>, Youhei SASAKI <uwabami@gfd-dennou.org>
- Subject: Bug#694614: tpu: cairo-dock/3.0.0-3 (pre-approval)
- From: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
- Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 13:09:02 +0000
- Message-id: <1357045742.15480.2.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
- Reply-to: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>, 694614@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <1356098310.24016.16.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
- References: <87y5hmugvd.wl%uwabami@gfd-dennou.org> <854nk75quw.fsf@boum.org> <CABMQnV+N21PFxidYC25sTZ1_Y70BJq6Act1e6C1S1zV+vZgR0A__34690.9043648795$1354324168$gmane$org@mail.gmail.com> <50B95B73.9000102@debian.org> <CABMQnVK02vGu01MccK1BFJqORrN1AAKH4vXhWg_TbJQ2KLv_sw@mail.gmail.com> <CABMQnVKDq+81PGpcxf_py-tFD-DPqUsJe6BjMXQcmjmqYh2Zug@mail.gmail.com> <20121202093105.GD5634@radis.cristau.org> <CABMQnVJKm7WUQovsTyQU7gxLh5uQTR7-L_8etxHLm9RWNjhLFQ@mail.gmail.com> <20121215224315.GW5634@radis.cristau.org> <CABMQnVLrAqKkEe6cZN8FuGuQYzL+DOVd8DZXn72GLZ4XPrtD6Q@mail.gmail.com> <1355664521.32176.35.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org> <CABMQnVKoJ67NPgVfb3=PrdWnYjEKZY-_gDur8nkXxzoSEuNr=A@mail.gmail.com> <1356098310.24016.16.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 13:58 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> I have to admit I'm slightly confused by the patches for #676841.
> According to the bug log, upstream indicated that the issue was related
> to optimisation when compiled with GCC 4.7, and that the fix was the
> small change displayed in
> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~cairo-dock-team/cairo-dock-core/cairo-dock/revision/1075 , whereas the debdiff for the proposed upload contains
>
> patches/0001-Main-GUI-fixed-a-crash-when-hovering-group-buttons-t.patch | 47 ++
> patches/0001-main-GUI-fix-a-case-where-the-description-dialog-pre.patch | 192 ++++++++++
>
> Which is correct?
Ping?
Regards,
Adam
Reply to: