Your message dated Wed, 9 Jan 2013 20:54:06 +0100 with message-id <20130109195406.GE5676@radis.cristau.org> and subject line Re: Bug#697667: unblock: opendkim/2.6.8-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #697667, regarding unblock: opendkim/2.6.8-4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 697667: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=697667 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: unblock: opendkim/2.6.8-4
- From: Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com>
- Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 02:55:00 -0500
- Message-id: <20130108075500.23326.71835.reportbug@Scott-Latitude-E6320>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package opendkim I haven't uploaded this to unstable yet, this is a pre-approval request as the bug is not RC, but it's a trivial fix backported from upstream with negligible risk of regression that will help admins diagnose and troubleshoot DKIM signing/verification issues. Since currently the logs get the message selector wrong (it logs the signing domain instead), it makes it very difficult to troubleshoot selector related isseus (which are not rare). Please let me know if this is OK and if so, I'm prepared to upload right away. unblock opendkim/2.6.8-4diff -u opendkim-2.6.8/debian/changelog opendkim-2.6.8/debian/changelog --- opendkim-2.6.8/debian/changelog +++ opendkim-2.6.8/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +opendkim (2.6.8-4) unstable; urgency=low + + * Backport fix from upstream to log the correct message selector + (Closes: #695145) (fix was included as part of the just released 2.7.4) + + -- Scott Kitterman <scott@kitterman.com> Tue, 08 Jan 2013 02:44:28 -0500 + opendkim (2.6.8-3) unstable; urgency=medium * Urgency medium for low risk RC bug fix only in patch2: unchanged: --- opendkim-2.6.8.orig/opendkim/opendkim.c +++ opendkim-2.6.8/opendkim/opendkim.c @@ -13365,7 +13365,7 @@ for (c = 0; c < nsigs; c++) { domain = dkim_sig_getdomain(sigs[c]); - selector = dkim_sig_getdomain(sigs[c]); + selector = dkim_sig_getselector(sigs[c]); err = dkim_sig_geterror(sigs[c]); errstr = dkim_sig_geterrorstr(err);
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com>, 697667-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#697667: unblock: opendkim/2.6.8-4
- From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 20:54:06 +0100
- Message-id: <20130109195406.GE5676@radis.cristau.org>
- In-reply-to: <1752116.0Ru0L5BNuy@scott-latitude-e6320>
- References: <20130108075500.23326.71835.reportbug@Scott-Latitude-E6320> <20130108185226.GZ5676@radis.cristau.org> <1752116.0Ru0L5BNuy@scott-latitude-e6320>
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 21:38:25 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Tuesday, January 08, 2013 07:52:26 PM Julien Cristau wrote: > > Control: tag -1 confirmed > > > > On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 02:55:00 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > > Please let me know if this is OK and if so, I'm prepared to upload right > > > away. > > > > Go ahead. > > Thanks, uploaded. > Unblocked. Cheers, JulienAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---