[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#697006: marked as done (unblock: freebsd-libs/9.0+ds1-3)

Your message dated Tue, 1 Jan 2013 13:56:27 +0100
with message-id <20130101125627.GP5634@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#697006: unblock: freebsd-libs/9.0+ds1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #697006,
regarding unblock: freebsd-libs/9.0+ds1-3
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
697006: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=697006
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package freebsd-libs

  This fixes a segfault in grub-probe due to a broken libgeom

diff -Nru freebsd-libs-9.0+ds1/debian/changelog freebsd-libs-9.0+ds1/debian/changelog
--- freebsd-libs-9.0+ds1/debian/changelog	2012-05-25 09:37:58.000000000 -0700
+++ freebsd-libs-9.0+ds1/debian/changelog	2012-12-29 15:49:51.000000000 -0800
@@ -1,3 +1,16 @@
+freebsd-libs (9.0+ds1-4) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  [ Christoph Egger ]
+  * Upload to unstable
+
+  [ Jeff Epler ]
+  * Fix 'warning: implicit declaration of function 'reallocf'
+    (and several other functions) (Closes: 685625)
+  * Make that warning an error so that it does not pass silently
+    in the future 
+
+ -- Christoph Egger <christoph@debian.org>  Sat, 29 Dec 2012 15:49:19 -0800
+
 freebsd-libs (9.0+ds1-3) unstable; urgency=low
 
   [ Robert Millan ]
diff -Nru freebsd-libs-9.0+ds1/debian/patches/implicit-declaration freebsd-libs-9.0+ds1/debian/patches/implicit-declaration
--- freebsd-libs-9.0+ds1/debian/patches/implicit-declaration	1969-12-31 16:00:00.000000000 -0800
+++ freebsd-libs-9.0+ds1/debian/patches/implicit-declaration	2012-12-29 15:49:02.000000000 -0800
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+Description: Fix crashes due to undeclared functions
+ The consequence of at least one of these (in geom_getxml.c) was a crash
+ when there was a lot of data in kern.geom.confdml.
+ .
+ freebsd-libs (9.0+ds1-3.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+ .
+   * Fix 'warning: implicit declaration of function 'reallocf'
+     (and several other functions) (Closes: 685625)
+Author: Jeff Epler <jepler@unpythonic.net>
+Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/685625
+
+---
+The information above should follow the Patch Tagging Guidelines, please
+checkout http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/ to learn about the format. Here
+are templates for supplementary fields that you might want to add:
+
+Forwarded: no
+Last-Update: <2012-12-21>
+
+--- freebsd-libs-9.0+ds1.orig/lib/libdevstat/devstat.c
++++ freebsd-libs-9.0+ds1/lib/libdevstat/devstat.c
+@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ __FBSDID("$FreeBSD$");
+ #include <sys/errno.h>
+ #include <sys/resource.h>
+ #include <sys/queue.h>
++#include <bsd/stdlib.h>
+ 
+ #include <ctype.h>
+ #include <err.h>
+--- freebsd-libs-9.0+ds1.orig/lib/libusbhid/usage.c
++++ freebsd-libs-9.0+ds1/lib/libusbhid/usage.c
+@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ __FBSDID("$FreeBSD$");
+ #include <stdio.h>
+ #include <stdlib.h>
+ #include <string.h>
++#include <bsd/stdio.h>
+ 
+ #include "usbhid.h"
+ 
+--- freebsd-libs-9.0+ds1.orig/lib/libgeom/geom_ctl.c
++++ freebsd-libs-9.0+ds1/lib/libgeom/geom_ctl.c
+@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
+ #include <string.h>
+ #include <stdlib.h>
+ #include <paths.h>
++#include <bsd/stdlib.h>
+ 
+ #include <sys/queue.h>
+ 
+--- freebsd-libs-9.0+ds1.orig/lib/libgeom/geom_getxml.c
++++ freebsd-libs-9.0+ds1/lib/libgeom/geom_getxml.c
+@@ -33,6 +33,8 @@
+ #include <sys/sysctl.h>
+ #include <stdlib.h>
+ #include <string.h>
++#include <bsd/stdlib.h>
++
+ #include "libgeom.h"
+ 
+ char *
+--- freebsd-libs-9.0+ds1.orig/sys/netinet/libalias/alias_db.c
++++ freebsd-libs-9.0+ds1/sys/netinet/libalias/alias_db.c
+@@ -157,6 +157,7 @@ __FBSDID("$FreeBSD$");
+ #include <sys/errno.h>
+ #include <sys/time.h>
+ #include <unistd.h> 
++#include <bsd/stdlib.h>
+ #endif
+ 
+ #include <sys/socket.h>
diff -Nru freebsd-libs-9.0+ds1/debian/patches/series freebsd-libs-9.0+ds1/debian/patches/series
--- freebsd-libs-9.0+ds1/debian/patches/series	2012-05-19 05:26:07.000000000 -0700
+++ freebsd-libs-9.0+ds1/debian/patches/series	2012-12-29 15:49:02.000000000 -0800
@@ -18,3 +18,4 @@
 libusb_backward.diff
 libbsd_nlist.diff
 kvm_size_t_kludge.diff
+implicit-declaration
diff -Nru freebsd-libs-9.0+ds1/debian/rules freebsd-libs-9.0+ds1/debian/rules
--- freebsd-libs-9.0+ds1/debian/rules	2012-05-25 09:34:52.000000000 -0700
+++ freebsd-libs-9.0+ds1/debian/rules	2012-12-29 15:49:02.000000000 -0800
@@ -18,7 +18,8 @@
 revision	:= $(shell echo $(full_version) | sed -e 's/^[^+-]*//g')
 
 CFLAGS = -Wall -g -pipe -fPIC -I. -I$(CURDIR)/sys -D_GNU_SOURCE \
-         -D__va_list=__builtin_va_list
+         -D__va_list=__builtin_va_list \
+	 -Werror=implicit-function-declaration
 
 ifneq (,$(filter noopt,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
 	CFLAGS += -O0


unblock freebsd-libs/9.0+ds1-3

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: kfreebsd-amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: kFreeBSD 10.0-0-amd64
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Tue, Jan  1, 2013 at 04:51:16 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:

> Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org> (30/12/2012):
> > On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 10:56:18 -0800, Christoph Egger wrote:
> > > Please unblock package freebsd-libs
> > > 
> > >   This fixes a segfault in grub-probe due to a broken libgeom
> > > 
> > Unblocked.  Needs a d-i ack for the udeb.
> 
> ACK.
> 
Thanks, added.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: