Your message dated Wed, 25 Dec 2013 22:37:01 +0100 with message-id <20131225213701.GQ4822@betterave.cristau.org> and subject line Re: Bug#717638: transition: libmetadata-extractor-java 2.6 has caused the Debian Bug report #717638, regarding transition: libmetadata-extractor-java 2.6 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 717638: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=717638 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: transition: libmetadata-extractor-java 2.6
- From: Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 11:16:36 +0200
- Message-id: <20130723091636.2691.86096.reportbug@debiandev>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition I'd like to request a transition slot for libmetadata-extractor-java 2.6. Debian currently ships the version 2.3 but the ongoing packaging effort for Apache Tika requires to upgrade this library to 2.6 or later (#499606). The new version is not compatible and impacts the following packages: josm gpsprune The package josm-plugins also depends on libmetadata-extractor-java but doesn't seems to use it directly. The new version of libmetadata-extractor-java is being worked on and will be uploaded to experimental soon. A patch for JOSM is being reviewed upstream. Thank you, Emmanuel Bourg
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org>, 717638-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#717638: transition: libmetadata-extractor-java 2.6
- From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2013 22:37:01 +0100
- Message-id: <20131225213701.GQ4822@betterave.cristau.org>
- In-reply-to: <20130905205853.GL4424@betterave.cristau.org>
- References: <20130723091636.2691.86096.reportbug@debiandev> <20130905205853.GL4424@betterave.cristau.org>
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 22:58:53 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > If that version is not compatible either the package name should be > changed (to not satisfy the Depends from the old josm/gpsprune), or the > new version should declare Breaks against the old reverse-deps, to make > sure they're upgraded together. > > Are there plans to also upload compatible josm and gpsprune versions to > experimental? > No reply, closing. Cheers, JulienAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---