[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#711345: marked as done (transition: cyrus-sasl2)

Your message dated Wed, 25 Dec 2013 22:36:01 +0100
with message-id <20131225213601.GP4822@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#711345: transition: cyrus-sasl2
has caused the Debian Bug report #711345,
regarding transition: cyrus-sasl2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
711345: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=711345
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Upstream SOVER change to fix #665476.

Ben file:

title = "cyrus-sasl2";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libsasl2-2" | .depends ~ "libsasl2-3";
is_good = .depends ~ "libsasl2-3";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libsasl2-2";


- -- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlGwgw8ACgkQ9OZqfMIN8nNodgCgokg2I0b/2RkrgWW0yK/uzEyv
7UEAnR1kf4uLgBEqbbXIBMX+nlICh7Ys
=c+jH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 15:20:14 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 11:48 PM, Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Jun  6, 2013 at 14:39:46 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> >
> > > Package: release.debian.org
> > > Severity: normal
> > > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > > Usertags: transition
> > >
> > > Upstream SOVER change to fix #665476.
> > >
> > So, err.  If we've shipped the new ABI in wheezy already, do we really
> > want to go through the pain of an unnecessary SONAME bump now?
> > Or is there some more ABI breakage in this release?
> >
> 
> I don't think so.
> 
> But:
> 
> a) do we really want to divert from upstream?
> b) I think it's nice to know that we are actually able to bump the SONAME
> at all, because the packages were not ready for SONAME bump at all.
> 
> Anyway I will not struggle hard if you decide it's not worth it.
> 
Let's table this one, I don't think there's much point.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: