[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#709039: marked as done (transition: x264)

Your message dated Mon, 2 Dec 2013 23:26:27 +0100
with message-id <20131202222627.GY4859@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#709039: transition: x264
has caused the Debian Bug report #709039,
regarding transition: x264
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
709039: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=709039
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Hi,

We would like to upload a new version of libx264 to unstable. There are
no API changes, but a few additional defines that requires acouple of rebuilds.

Ben file:

title = "x264";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libx264-129" | .depends ~ "libx264-130";
is_good = .depends ~ "libx264-130";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libx264-129";

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 13:46:06 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:

> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> 
> Hi,
> 
> We would like to upload a new version of libx264 to unstable. There are
> no API changes, but a few additional defines that requires acouple of rebuilds.
> 
This is finished as of tonight's britney run.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: