Hi, we currently have: | libsigrok (0.1.1-1 to 0.2.0-2) | | Maintainer: Uwe Hermann | 35 days old (needed 10 days) | out of date on armel: libsigrok0 (from 0.1.1-1) | Not considered | | libsigrokdecode (0.1.0-2 to 0.2.0-2) | | Maintainer: Uwe Hermann | 35 days old (needed 10 days) | out of date on armel: libsigrokdecode0 (from 0.1.0-2) | Not considered The former seems to be due to a transient buildd issue, so I've just given it back. The latter looks like a proper build, but maybe against the old libsigrok binary packages. Once libsigrok is (hopefully) built, libsigrokdecode might want a binNMU on armel. It would be nice if the maintainer could keep an eye on this and report back. Mraw, KiBi.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature