Bug#725304: pu: package kfreebsd-9/9.0-10+deb70.5
On Thu, 2013-10-03 at 23:06 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> On 03/10/13 22:17, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Does this affect unstable? If so, please update the BTS accordingy, get
> > the fix there, and revisit the pu bug afterwards.
>
> The change (dropping 101_nullfs_vsock.diff) was already made back in
> 9.1-1, and so I've updated the BTS accordingly. I agree that detail is
> missing from the changelog, as it was hard even for me to determine this
> just now.
Thanks.
> I wonder if we have an opportunity to fix the non-standard version
> numbering we have at the moment, perhaps by calling this pu something
> like 9.0-12+deb7u1 instead (because changes from 9.0-11 and -12 are
> already incorporated in this)? Or if it is less confusing to stay with
> what we have?
If you were to do something like that, a changelog entry would be
helpful in order to reduce confusion.
> > Why this version number? security seems to only have 9.0-10+deb70.3
>
> There is a 9.0-10+deb70.4 upload in Secre^WSecurity Team's queue since
> 23 days ago but I've no idea the status if this. [rt.debian.org #4671]
In that case, the status of that package needs clarifying. Releasing .5
via p-u if .4 is then going to appear via security doesn't really work.
Regards,
Adam
Reply to: