Bug#725304: pu: package kfreebsd-9/9.0-10+deb70.5
On 03/10/13 22:17, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Does this affect unstable? If so, please update the BTS accordingy, get
> the fix there, and revisit the pu bug afterwards.
The change (dropping 101_nullfs_vsock.diff) was already made back in
9.1-1, and so I've updated the BTS accordingly. I agree that detail is
missing from the changelog, as it was hard even for me to determine this
just now.
I wonder if we have an opportunity to fix the non-standard version
numbering we have at the moment, perhaps by calling this pu something
like 9.0-12+deb7u1 instead (because changes from 9.0-11 and -12 are
already incorporated in this)? Or if it is less confusing to stay with
what we have?
> Why this version number? security seems to only have 9.0-10+deb70.3
There is a 9.0-10+deb70.4 upload in Secre^WSecurity Team's queue since
23 days ago but I've no idea the status if this. [rt.debian.org #4671]
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
steven@pyro.eu.org
Reply to: