On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 19:44:44 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Hi, > > As I've seen it come up a few times recently, I'm proposing adding some > explicit RC requirements relating to upgrades between releases. I don't > think there's anything particularly controversial about this, as it's > basically documenting long-standing practice. > > A first cut at some wording is below. It fits in the current > "dependencies" section, but as alternatives we could add a new top-level > section or a subsection under the catch-all "general" heading. > > Comments welcome. > Looks fine to me, thanks. Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature