[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Openstack-devel] New proposed-updates diff: keystone 2012.1.1-13+wheezy1



Hi Adam,

On Fri May 10 2013 03:26:34 PM CST, Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote:

> On 2013-05-10 7:00, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > In the past, I have uploaded some security updates
> > through stable-proposed-updates. Are you saying
> > that this is the wrong thing to do?
> 
> If the security team have indicated that they don't plan on issuing a 
> DSA to cover an issue and you've discussed it with the release team and 
> had the upload acked, it's entirely the right thing to do.

Ok, well noted.

> > I do beleive that a DSA
> > is planned (and if it not, then we should).
> 
> The issue is marked in the security tracker as "no-dsa", which 
> certainly indicates one isn't planned.

Allright.

Thanks for the long explanation. Next time the
security team asks to upload to s-p-u, I will
ask the release team as you told me. Sorry if I did
wrong then. Hopefully there is only little harm in
this case.

Thomas

p.s: If you need me to do any further action, let
me know! :)


Reply to: