[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#702353: marked as done (unblock: python2.7/2.7.3-8)

Your message dated Sun, 5 May 2013 18:34:41 +0200
with message-id <20130505163441.GV12846@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#702353: unblock: python2.7/2.7.3-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #702353,
regarding unblock: python2.7/2.7.3-8
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
702353: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702353
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

python2.7 (2.7.3-8) unstable; urgency=low

  * python2.7: Replace python2.7-minimal (<< 2.7.3-7). Closes: #702005.
  * Build the _md5, _sha1, _sha256 and _sha512 extension modules.

python2.7 (2.7.3-7) unstable; urgency=low

  * python2.7-dbg: Tighten dependency on python2.7. Closes: #700809.

Fixes

 - build failures on buildds not upgraded to the recent python2.7
   version in testing.
 - the upgrade from the amd64 2.7.3-6 build (sorry, can' reproduce
   what exactly did go wrong).
 - a standalone installation of python2.7-minimal.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 15:38:35 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:

> On Sun, 2013-03-24 at 23:07 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > What's the rationale for the second item?  hashlib already provides
> > > those through libcrypto, AIUI, why is the duplication necessary?
> > 
> > - to provide the same modules as in the debug interpreter.
> > - to provide them in python2.7-minimal, where hashlib isn't available.
> 
> The only in-archive packages using -minimal appear to be python-support
> and python itself. What particular benefit does having the modules in
> -minimal provide for wheezy?
> 
Too late now, closing.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: