[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#700605: marked as done (nmu: ruby libraries lacking rubygems integration)

Your message dated Sun, 5 May 2013 18:36:37 +0200
with message-id <20130505163637.GW12846@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#700605: nmu: ruby libraries lacking rubygems integration
has caused the Debian Bug report #700605,
regarding nmu: ruby libraries lacking rubygems integration
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
700605: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=700605
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu ruby-bcrypt_3.0.1-2 ruby-bdb_0.6.5-7 ruby-dep-selector_0.0.8-1 ruby-eventmachine_0.12.10-3 ruby-gherkin_2.11.1-1 ruby-globalhotkeys_0.3.2-3 ruby-libxml_2.3.2-1 ruby-msgpack_0.4.6-4 ruby-raindrops_0.10.0-1 ruby-sequel-pg_1.5.0-1 ruby-shadow_2.1.4-2 ruby-systemtimer_1.2.3-2 ruby-taglib2_0.1.5-1 ruby-termios_0.9.6-2 . ALL . -m "rebuild to enable rubygems integration"

Hello,

the above are all the "arch: any" ruby libraries that are currently
lacking rubygems integration and where a simple rebuild would enable
it (I tested it by rebuilding them all, rubygems-integration can be
seen with the existence of files in /usr/share/rubygems-integration).
Their problem is "just" that they haven't been reuploaded since
gem2deb 0.3 hit Debian.

I believe we should bin-nmu them all right now because:

1/ any future bin-nmu or security update will lead to those changes
anyway, and it's better to have those changes now while they can
still be tested until the release than after a stable release where
this kind of change is even more frowned upon

2/ in the ruby world, end-users are encouraged to use gems and the more
gems are provided by Debian, the less pre-compiled binaries users will
download via this tool.

Thank you!

ruby-bcrypt_3.0.1-2
ruby-bdb_0.6.5-7
ruby-dep-selector_0.0.8-1
ruby-eventmachine_0.12.10-3
ruby-gherkin_2.11.1-1
ruby-globalhotkeys_0.3.2-3
ruby-libxml_2.3.2-1
ruby-msgpack_0.4.6-4
ruby-raindrops_0.10.0-1
ruby-sequel-pg_1.5.0-1
ruby-shadow_2.1.4-2
ruby-systemtimer_1.2.3-2
ruby-taglib2_0.1.5-1
ruby-termios_0.9.6-2

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.7-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

-- 
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer

Get the Debian Administrator's Handbook:
→ http://debian-handbook.info/get/

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 09:03:16 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:

> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
> 
> nmu ruby-bcrypt_3.0.1-2 ruby-bdb_0.6.5-7 ruby-dep-selector_0.0.8-1 ruby-eventmachine_0.12.10-3 ruby-gherkin_2.11.1-1 ruby-globalhotkeys_0.3.2-3 ruby-libxml_2.3.2-1 ruby-msgpack_0.4.6-4 ruby-raindrops_0.10.0-1 ruby-sequel-pg_1.5.0-1 ruby-shadow_2.1.4-2 ruby-systemtimer_1.2.3-2 ruby-taglib2_0.1.5-1 ruby-termios_0.9.6-2 . ALL . -m "rebuild to enable rubygems integration"
> 
Didn't happen in time for wheezy, closing this request, as I assume
there'll be source uploads for these in the future.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: