Re: Quagga 0.99.21 update (was Re: frozen-proposed-updates?)
Am Sun, 28 Apr 2013 17:24:26 +0100
schrieb "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>:
> On Sun, 2013-04-28 at 18:18 +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
> > Am Sun, 28 Apr 2013 17:00:59 +0100
> > schrieb "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>:
> > > The version information also indicates that the problem applies
> > > to the version of quagga in unstable. If that's correct, please
> > > fix it in unstable; if not, please add an appropriate fixed
> > > version.
> >
> > We've 0.99.22 in unstable (and 0.99.22.1 with a fix coming soon) and
> > 0.99.21 in testing. At this stage of the freeze, I'd rather prefer a
> > fixed 0.99.21 than the 0.99.22 to be released.
>
> I wasn't suggesting that we ship 0.99.22 in wheezy, I was asking
> whether the package in unstable contains the fix. Looking at the
> code, the answer is "yes, it does", which makes your answer that it's
> "coming soon" slightly confusing. :-(
Sorry, came to my mind as well and I've already send a mail to
control@bugs to mark the 0.99.22 version as fixed.
> Please go ahead with the upload. Please also fix the version
> information for the bug to indicate that it doesn't apply to the
> package in unstable.
OK, thanks!
bye,
-christian-
Reply to: