Re: Quagga 0.99.21 update (was Re: frozen-proposed-updates?)

["Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>]

On Sun, 2013-04-28 at 18:18 +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
> Am Sun, 28 Apr 2013 17:00:59 +0100
> schrieb "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>:
> > The version information also indicates that the problem applies to the
> > version of quagga in unstable. If that's correct, please fix it in
> > unstable; if not, please add an appropriate fixed version.
> 
> We've 0.99.22 in unstable (and 0.99.22.1 with a fix coming soon) and
> 0.99.21 in testing. At this stage of the freeze, I'd rather prefer a
> fixed 0.99.21 than the 0.99.22 to be released.

I wasn't suggesting that we ship 0.99.22 in wheezy, I was asking whether
the package in unstable contains the fix. Looking at the code, the
answer is "yes, it does", which makes your answer that it's "coming
soon" slightly confusing. :-(

Please go ahead with the upload. Please also fix the version information
for the bug to indicate that it doesn't apply to the package in
unstable.

Regards,

Adam